Current Schoalary Articles About Reading Outside of School

Introduction

There is a large achievement gap betwixt the secondary school students who do and those who exercise not read books during leisure time (OECD, 2010; Mol and Bus, 2011). From sixth grade onward (Jacobs et al., 2002) sex differences become salient equally well in this respect, with boys reading less than girls (Coles and Hall, 2002; Logan and Johnston, 2009; Mullan, 2010). However, some of the non-leisure readers perform better than other non-leisure readers, and it is non known which factors are determinants of this variability. In order to develop effective programs to reduce achievement gaps in secondary schoolhouse, it is imperative to gain insight into the determinants that could explain private differences within groups that run a higher risk of lower school achievement. Non-leisure readers are such a group. The present paper describes a large-scale survey aimed at evaluating possible determinants and identifying which of these would be suitable for intervention programs.

We conducted our survey study in an historic period-homogeneous sample of seventh grade students (N = 1,071) from the Netherlands. These 12- and 13-year-olds had just made the transition from primary to secondary school. Adjusting to their new bookish environment involves dealing with many challenges. The transition is accompanied by a major change in cognitive and social functioning; the schoolhouse structure, and the nature of the curriculum is different, new subjects have to exist learned, the social network changes, and new friends accept to exist fabricated. Students have to learn to manage, plan, and execute various homework assignments competing for their attention. Consequently, students' leisure time activities change as well (due east.g., Ferguson and Fraser, 1998; Pedersen, 2005). The demands of their new school environment may reduce the time that students have – and/or take – to read for leisure.

It has been establish that almost fifty per centum of Dutch 15-year-olds report that they never read for pleasure; this was even college than the international average of 37% (OECD, 2010). Information technology has to be taken into account, however, that while students might not read for leisure, this does not necessarily mean that they dislike reading books. Therefore, the electric current study aimed both to make up one's mind the prevalence of leisure reading in seventh course as well as of the subjective "joy of reading" experienced by leisure versus non-leisure readers. Because of the recent indications that boys and girls may differ in neuropsychological development (e.g., Lenroot and Giedd, 2010) also as in reading behavior and enjoyment (Coles and Hall, 2002; Jacobs et al., 2002; Chiu and McBride-Chang, 2006; Logan and Johnston, 2009; Mullan, 2010; OECD, 2010), we also investigated sex differences.

A contempo meta-analysis showed that leisure readers in College and Academy graduated high school with higher GPAs than their not-leisure reading peers (Mol and Bus, 2011). A positive screw of reciprocal causation seems to explain that leisure readers increase skills that are important for their academic success, such equally their vocabulary and reading comprehension. Meliorate skilled readers, in plough, are more likely to relish what they are reading, to continue reading voluntarily, and to increase their school performance. In general, students who savour reading tin get absorbed by the narrative world when reading works of fiction (Dark-green and Brock, 2002; Oatley, 2012). Such reading engagement is thought to support the construction of mental situational models that increase story comprehension (Mar, 2004; Oatley, 2011). Successful reading comprehension, in turn, is non only related to reading enjoyment, only too to academic success (Morgan and Fuchs, 2007; Retelsdorf et al., 2011). Therefore, for non-leisure readers in item, information technology is of import to determine whether their schoolhouse achievement is or is non related to their general reading enjoyment. If that is the case, this could be a promising insight for interventions. To this finish, we hypothesized that not-leisure readers who do enjoy reading get college school grades than those who do not enjoy reading. We further expected our findings to indicate that girls in this subgroup accomplish better than boys.

1 ability that seems to affect reading enjoyment and reading comprehension is mental imagery or the propensity of readers to form mental pictures of the written story in "their heed'south eye" (Sadoski and Paivio, 2001). Interestingly, mental imagery is considered to be an essential role of transportation into the narrative world (Dark-green, 2004; Oatley, 2011). It is also idea to enhance reading comprehension, because forming bright images of a story improves the quality of readers' mental situational models (Mar, 2004; Yarkoni et al., 2008; Speer et al., 2009; for a review, see De Koning and Van der Schoot, 2013). However, at that place is private variability in the vividness with which people are able to movie scenes in "their heed's eye" (due east.g., Cui et al., 2007). This variability seems to be related to experience (Isaac and Marks, 1994; Sadoski and Paivio, 2001; Gennari, 2012). As leisure readers are expected to have more experience with books and with edifice mental models that support story comprehension, nosotros volition examine whether they are more likely to appoint in mental imagery than non-leisure readers. Until now, no sex differences have been reported in mental imagery (e.g., Richardson, 1995).

The Current Study

The reciprocal model of causation suggests that non-leisure readers are at highest take a chance of poor school accomplishment (Mol and Motorcoach, 2011). Children who do non read books voluntarily are less likely to enjoy reading and engage less in mental imagery. Hence, this subgroup is most likely to receive relatively low school grades as compared to students who exercise read for pleasure and savour reading. In the Netherlands, this negative spiral could result in an overrepresentation of non-leisure readers in the lower full general educational track of secondary schoolhouse. That is, the Dutch school system is highly stratified from seventh grade onward. The lower, pre-vocational general educational track (i.e., VMBO) takes 4 years and allows students to continue with a vocational teaching. The college, pre-academic educational runway takes either five (i.e., HAVO) or half-dozen (i.due east., VWO) years and prepares students for College and/or University. Students are assigned to one of these tracks in their final twelvemonth of primary school, when they are 10- to 11-years-onetime on boilerplate. Students' placement is based on their full score on a nationwide exam that includes multiple-pick questions that mensurate students' aptitude in Dutch language, reading comprehension, math, world orientation (i.e., geography, biology, and history), and study skills (www.authorities.nl/issues/didactics). Research has indeed shown that students in the lower track read less ofttimes, accept lower reading comprehension skills, and savour reading less than students in the college track (Gille et al., 2010; The Dutch Inspectorate of Education, 2012). Lower-rail students often find reading texts for schoolhouse irksome and challenging, which is probably due to their relatively poor technical reading skills and lack of adequate comprehension strategies (Schram, 2007).

To amend understand the consequences of non-leisure reading, it is of import that researchers and practitioners admit individual differences in adolescents' academic opportunities that are strongly related to their leisure reading habits from an early age onward. In non-stratified school systems, written report findings may be confounded by achievement differences that tin exist attributed to students' leisure reading history, withal. The Dutch schooling system, in contrast, offers u.s. an opportunity to look into two groups that are ought to differ in school achievement, but whose within-grouping differences in schooling situation are relatively small. For example, students' grades reflect their functioning on exams that are adjusted to their corresponding textbook cognition, reading skills, and expected level of subject mastery. We expect that reading enjoyment and mental imagery will play a unlike office in the actual school achievement of students in the higher, pre-academic track as compared to students in the lower, pre-vocational track. That is, it may be particularly important that students relish reading in gild to succeed in the higher track, considering the complexity level of their courses and textbooks may crave stronger developed reading abilities than needed in the lower track. Because girls mostly are better students than boys (The Dutch Inspectorate of Education, 2012), it is hypothesized that boys who practise not enjoy reading run the highest take chances of low schoolhouse functioning in the higher track in particular. Importantly, our findings will apply to students attention different educational systems as well. This written report could inform researchers and practitioners beyond the globe about the role of reading enjoyment and mental imagery for students who are relatively depression versus high achievers.

In sum, this study addressed the following research questions, separately for students in the lower and higher educational track of their first year in secondary school in kingdom of the netherlands:

1. What is the occurrence of reading enjoyment and mental imagery among leisure and non-leisure readers?
2. To what extent do reading enjoyment, mental imagery, and sex explain differences in the school achievement of non-leisure readers?

Materials and Methods

Participants

A large, homogeneous group of i,071 seventh graders from five secondary schools in kingdom of the netherlands (548 boys, 523 girls), with a mean age of M = 12.54 years (SD = 0.53; Range: 11.25–14.75 years) was analyzed. All but 19 students were 12 years erstwhile (47.five%) and thirteen years erstwhile (l.7%). Except for students who repeated or skipped a yr in kindergarten (due north = 39), students who had repeated (northward = 126) or skipped (n = 32) a course in primary or secondary schoolhouse (i.e., grade 1 to grade 7) have been excluded from this sample in order to brand our group homogeneous with respect to both age and developmental level. Nigh all participants had the Dutch nationality (96.7%) and were native speakers (95.eight%). Some students (14.7%) had 1 or two immigrant parents, of whom 59.0% came from western countries. Thirty-four children (3.2%; north _12-yr-olds = 14, n _13-year-olds = 20) self-reported that they were officially diagnosed with dyslexia.

Participants were in their first yr of secondary schoolhouse. The schools they attended offered the lower and the higher educational tracks in both single-rails classrooms (i.eastward., lower = VMBO; higher = HAVO, and VWO), also equally in combined runway classrooms (i.e., lower = VMBO/HAVO; higher = HAVO/VWO). In the latter, combined classroom type, students stream into a single rails classroom in grade 8 or ix. Overall, 35% of our participants (n = 375; 50.1% boys) were in the lower full general educational rail, which closely resembles the Dutch national average of 40% (Ministry building of Educational activity Culture and Science, 2011). In our report, 65% of the participants (n = 696; 51.7% boys) were enrolled in the higher educational rails.

Measures

Leisure reading

Students were asked to select those activities they engaged in during leisure time. They were presented with a list of 10 activities, including reading. The other activities could be categorized into: physical activities (sports, playing outside, interim); social activities (calling friends, online chatting); creative activities (doing arts and crafts, painting); and screen-related activities (playing video games, using the reckoner and Internet). For the current study, nosotros categorized all students who checked reading as a leisure activeness as leisure readers (n = 299), and those who did non select reading as not-leisure readers (n = 772).

Reading enjoyment

Students were asked to respond to the post-obit statement: "I love to read books (fiction, comic books)" on a iii-point scale. In reading enquiry (e.thou., Bennett et al., 2002; Coles and Hall, 2002; Acevedo-Polakovich et al., 2007), a single-item is often used to tap into this construct. In the field of psychology (eastward.thou., Wanous et al., 1997; Gardner et al., 1998; Dollinger and Malmquist, 2009), it has been shown that such an assessment method is too valid and reliable, particularly in large samples. We dichotomized all answers to create a group of non-enjoyers (i.due east., non at all truthful), and reading enjoyers (i.e., somewhat true, completely true). We decided to combine the latter reply options, because preliminary analyses showed that our findings were comparable for the group who agreed "somewhat" and "completely."

Mental imagery

Students were asked to point whether they recognized themselves in the following profile: "While I am reading a story, I employ my imagination. I see a film of the story in my mind's eye, and I see what happens, and what the main character looks like." This single-detail measure has been shown to be a valid estimator of imagery. In a study among 124 lower-rail students attending grade 7–9 and 110 of their parents (Mol et al., unpublished data), nosotros found stiff correlations with the sum score of ten items of a validated Dutch questionnaire capturing visual, auditory, and social imagery during reading (Tellegen and Frankhuisen, 2002) and our single-item mensurate: r _adolescents = 0.57 (p < 0.001) and r _parents = 0.65 (p < 0.001). Students who responded "not at all" in this study were assigned to the not-imagery grouping; whereas students who selected "somewhat truthful" or "completely true" were categorized equally mental imagery users.

School achievement

Final grades (ranging from 1.0 = very bad, to 10.0 = outstanding) for the first semester of the 3 schoolhouse subjects "Dutch," "mathematics," and "English language every bit a foreign language" were requested for each student. These grades were used to guess school success (Reed et al., 2010), since successful performance in these three subjects is a main goal of Dutch secondary education (Ministry of Instruction, Civilization and Science, 2006). To ensure that the distribution of scores was similar for each school, and to control for possible grading differences across schools, nosotros outset standardized children'southward boilerplate grade inside each school. The overall standardized mean school accomplishment was equal to 1000 = 0 and SD = ane (range: -3.l to 2.87).

Mean grades significantly differed between classroom types (e.1000., HAVO = unmarried-rails classroom, HAVO/VWO = combined-rails classroom). Students attending unmarried-track classrooms received significantly higher mean school grades in both the lower (northward = 136, M = 0.26, SD = 0.89) and higher full general educational tracks (northward = 330, M = 0.27, SD = 1.02) than students attending combined classrooms in both tracks (north _{lower track} = 224, M = -0.41, SD = 0.92; n _{college track} = 256, M = -0.13, SD = 0.94). A plausible caption could be that teachers have to exist relatively stricter when assigning good grades to students in combined classrooms, because students' referral to a single-track classroom with a relatively college (eastward.g., VWO) or lower level (e.chiliad., HAVO) at the cease of course 7 or eight is based on their mean grades. Consequently, we controlled for classroom type in each analysis with school achievement.

Demographics

Students reported their sex activity (male child/daughter), birth date, age, educational track, and classroom blazon in secondary school (VMBO, VMBO/HAVO, HAVO, HAVO/VWO, VWO). They likewise reported whether they had skipped or repeated a class in main or secondary schoolhouse. They further filled in their own land of birth as well as their parents', their first linguistic communication, and whether they were officially diagnosed with dyslexia.

Procedure

This written report was part of the LEERLIJN study, for which ten schools across kingdom of the netherlands were recruited. Care was taken to draw the schools from the puddle of "mainstream" secondary schools in the Netherlands. In this process, we aimed to ensure that the schools were similar with respect to socio-demographic factors, ethnicity, and educational quality. For the current comparison written report, we excluded four schools that but offered the higher educational track, and ane school that had classrooms with a heterogeneous combination of all tracks. Consequently, any differences between students from the lower and college tracks cannot be attributed to differences in schoolhouse community, because all children attended secondary schools that offered both lower and higher educational tracks.

In their second semester, students individually completed an online survey on a school calculator in a classroom setting. A research banana explained how to admission and fill up in the survey. Together with the classroom teacher, the assistant made sure that students worked quietly and independently. Response rates were high: Across the five included schools, consummate data were collected for 84.2% (n = 1,228) of all students who received an informational letter of the alphabet and got parental consent to participate. Teachers' response rates for providing students' average school grades was 88.i% (n = 944). The online questionnaire format did not allow students to exit any question unanswered, so there were no missing values.

Results

As is shown in Table 1, students from the two general educational tracks differed on all our variables of interest (i.due east., leisure reading, reading enjoyment, mental imagery, schoolhouse achievement). No differences were constitute on any background variable (i.e., age, sex, ethnicity, first language, dyslexia diagnosis). In the following sections, we will answer our inquiry questions separately for the lower versus higher educational tracks. Get-go, we will look into frequency distributions. 2d, within the subgroup of non-leisure readers, nosotros examined the determinants of students' school accomplishment past conducting a GLM Univariate ANCOVA, in which we entered reading enjoyment, imagery, and sexual practice equally the independent variables, and classroom blazon as a covariate.

TABLE 1. Distribution of seventh graders over lower versus higher educational tracks in secondary school.

Lower Educational Rail

Leisure reading differences

In the lower educational runway, 375 seventh graders participated. But xix.5% (northward = 73) of students indicated that they read during leisure time. Sixty-six percentage of all students were reading enjoyers and 88% engaged in mental imagery.

As expected, leisure readers reported significantly more than reading enjoyment [χ²(1) = 35.84, p < 0.001] and mental imagery [χ²(1) = seven.36, p = 0.007] than not-leisure readers. Specifically, well-nigh all non-enjoyers were non-leisure readers (97.6%; SR = two.i). In that location was hardly any student who did not engage in mental imagery and notwithstanding was a leisure reader (0.04%; SR = -two.three). In curt, leisure readers were very likely to bask reading and to engage in mental imagery.

A minority of 12% of all boys and 27% of all girls indicated that they read during their leisure fourth dimension. Meaning sex differences were found in leisure reading [χ²(one) = xiv.50, p < 0.001]: only 30.1% of all leisure readers were boys (SR = -2.4). In addition, more than boys did not enjoy reading (SR = 2.0) than girls (SR = -ii.1), χⁱⁱ(i) = 12.70, p < 0.001 (see Table 2 for frequency distributions). There were no sex differences in mental imagery [χ²(i) = 0.threescore, p = 0.438].

TABLE two. Sexual practice distribution between general educational tracks when comparing leisure time readers with not-leisure readers on reading enjoyment and mental imagery.

School achievement differences amidst non-leisure readers

In the side by side assay, we just included non-leisure readers (n = 302). As is shown in Tabular array 3, almost all non-leisure readers who enjoyed reading engaged in mental imagery (SR = 3.4), whereas non-leisure readers who did not enjoy reading were significantly more likely not to engage in mental imagery (SR = -2.viii), χ²(one) = 23.06, p < 0.001.

TABLE 3. Differences in reading enjoyment and mental imagery for non-leisure readers in lower and higher general educational tracks.

We conducted a GLM Univariate ANCOVA with school accomplishment equally the dependent variable, and tested chief effects of reading enjoyment, mental imagery, and sex as well every bit the interactions between sex and reading enjoyment, and sexual practice and imagery. Mean grades were bachelor for 290 students. The overall model with these two interaction terms explained 16.8% of the variance [F(half dozen,283) = 10.74, p < 0.001, η² = 0.19). The main furnishings for sex [F(1,283) = iii.97, p = 0.053, η² = 0.01], reading enjoyment [F(1,283) = 1.41, p = 0.235, η^two = 0.00], and mental imagery [F(one,283) = 0.53, p = 0.467, η² = 0.00) were not significant. The covariate classroom blazon was [F(i,283) = 42.60, p < 0.001, ηⁱⁱ = 0.xiii].The interaction between sexual practice and reading enjoyment was significant equally well [F(1,283) = 6.41, p = 0.012, ηⁱⁱ = 0.02]. As is shown in Figure 1A, girls who were reading enjoyers scored 0.40 boilerplate class points higher than girls who were non-enjoyers; whereas boys' reading enjoyment did not seem to explicate their school achievements. In short, reading enjoyment appears to play a role in the school accomplishment of girls in particular.

FIGURE i. School achievement differences explained past sex activity and reading enjoyment in non-leisure readers, for the lower (A) and college (B) general educational tracks.

Higher Educational Track

Leisure reading differences

Cocky-report information were collected for 696 students in the college educational track. A minority of 32.v% (n = 226) of seventh graders indicated that they read during their leisure time. About eighty% enjoyed reading and 93.4% engaged in mental imagery (meet Table i).

Leisure readers were significantly more likely to enjoy reading [χ ⁱⁱ (1) = 83.02, p < 0.001] and to engage in mental imagery [χⁱⁱ(one) = 10.48, p = 0.001] than non-leisure readers. Specifically, the majority of non-enjoyers were categorized as not-leisure readers (98.half dozen%; SR = 4.6). In addition, the subset of students who did not engage in mental imagery (n = 46) were hardly categorized every bit leisure readers (0.02%; SR = -ii.6). Put differently, most leisure readers enjoyed reading and engaged in mental imagery.

19 pct of all boys and 46% of all girls were leisure readers. Of all leisure readers, 31.0% were boys. Pregnant sex differences were found in leisure reading [χ²(1) = 57.71, p < 0.001) and reading enjoyment [χ²(1) = 38.45, p < 0.001]: Boys were underrepresented as leisure readers (SR = -four.3) and reading enjoyers (SR = -two.0), but more than probable to exist categorized as non-leisure readers (SR = 3.0) and non-enjoyers (SR = three.8). The opposite pattern was found for girls (SR_{leisure readers} = 4.5, SR_enjoyers = two.1; SR_{non-leisure readers} = -3.one, SR_non-enjoyers = -4.0, respectively). This implies that more girls than boys were leisure readers and reading enjoyers (encounter Table 2). Finally, the standardized residuals did not exceed the critical range for mental imagery [i.e., were -one.7, one.vii; χ²(1) = 6.28, p = 0.012], showing no sex differences.

School accomplishment differences amidst not-leisure readers

Near non-leisure readers (due north = 470) enjoyed reading (68.9%) and engaged in mental imagery (91.iii%). Those who did non engage in mental imagery were almost likely to exist categorized as non-enjoyers of reading (SR = 2.half dozen), χ²(1) = 10.71, p = 0.001 (run into Table iii).

Hateful school grades were available for 400 non-leisure readers in the college rails. GLM Univariate ANCOVA analyses showed that sexual practice, reading enjoyment, mental imagery, and classroom type explained 7.8% of the variance of school achievement [F(half dozen,393) = 6.44, p < 0.001, η² = 0.09]. The interaction between sexual activity and reading enjoyment was non significant [F(1,393) = 0.01, p = 0.938, η² = 0.00]. Farther, the interaction between sex and mental imagery only approached significance [F(one,393) = 3.48, p = 0.059, η² = 0.01] and will not be explored further due to the relatively small pct (north = 31) of students who did not engage in mental imagery.

Main effects were constitute for sex [F(1,393) = 13.40, p < 0.001, η² = 0.03] and reading enjoyment [F(1,393) = 4.92, p = 0.027, η² = 0.01] and the covariate classroom type [F(1,393) = viii.75, p = 0.003, η² = 0.02], but not for mental imagery [F(ane,393) = 0.07, p = 0.791, ηⁱⁱ = 0.00]. Girls who were reading enjoyers scored 0.22 standardized, average grade points higher than girls who were non-enjoyers; and boys who were reading enjoyers scored 0.34 class points higher than boys who were non-enjoyers (encounter Effigy 1B). Overall, analyses showed that reading enjoyment played a positive role in the school achievement scores of both boys and girls.

Discussion

This study offered the unique opportunity to examine which determinants of leisure reading are related to schoolhouse achievement in a large number of students who were similar in educational stage. This similarity reduced variability related to age and schooling. Two research questions were addressed for both the 375 students in the lower track and the 696 students in the higher track of the participating Dutch schools. First, we establish that a minority of only 19.5% of students in the lower and 32.5% in the higher educational rails indicated that they read during their leisure time. Almost all these leisure readers enjoyed reading and formed images of the story they were reading in "the mind's centre" (i.eastward., they engaged in mental imagery). As expected, more girls than boys read exterior schoolhouse and enjoyed reading, whereas no sex differences were institute for mental imagery. Second, the majority of non-leisure readers reported that they enjoyed reading. Except for boys in the lower runway, this subgroup of reading enjoyers performed better academically than those who did not enjoy reading.

Secondary school students are non a homogeneous group in terms of school achievement and leisure reading behavior. The advantage of a highly stratified educational arrangement like the one in holland is that we can remove some heterogeneity by separately examining relatively low and high achievers attending the lower and higher educational tracks, respectively. In this study, we constitute that a greater percentage of students in the lower rail were non-leisure readers, did not enjoy reading, and did not engage in mental imagery compared to students in the college tracks. Lower-track students also got lower school grades on average. These findings highlight the importance of looking into subgroups of secondary school students when aiming to understand the relation between leisure reading and school achievement; a relation that is affected by adolescents' reading history also as the quality of their home literacy environment from an early historic period onward (Conlon et al., 2006). Such an approach can inform interventions that focus on students who run the highest risk of poor school achievement within relatively lower- and higher-achieving groups.

The start aim of this report was to examine the occurrence of leisure reading, reading enjoyment, and mental imagery of 12- and 13-year-former Dutch secondary schoolhouse students. We found that the majority of students in both educational tracks did not list reading amongst their leisure activities. More than specifically, 8 out of ten lower-track students and 2 out of three college-track students did not engage in leisure reading. Nosotros investigated reading as an integral part of students' leisure time activities instead of using a question format that is probable to elicit more than socially desirable answers, such as estimating reading frequencies (Mol and Bus, 2011). Our approach seemed to reveal an even more skewed distribution of boyish readers than was plant in the contempo PISA-investigation, in which 49% of Dutch fifteen-year-former students indicated that they never read for pleasure (Gille et al., 2010; OECD, 2010). Interestingly, more than half of the non-leisure readers in our sample were willing to admit that they enjoyed reading books and comics in general.

Not-leisure readers who did not enjoy reading hardly used mental imagery strategies during reading; whereas those who did read for leisure were near all imagery users. In both educational tracks, near 94% of the not-leisure readers who indicated that they enjoy reading in general also engaged in mental imagery. These findings seem to be in line with previous enquiry linking reading habits, mental imagery, and reading enjoyment, every bit role of the experience of transportation into the narrative world (e.g., Green, 2004; Busselle and Bilandzic, 2008; Oatley, 2011; Weibel et al., 2011). In addition, recent theories of embodied knowledge (Barsalou, 2008; Glenberg, 2011) advise that reading nigh a situation in a novel or a story drives the brain into perceptual, active, and emotional states that simulate the mental states that arise during the perception of, and the acting in, an verbal same existent-life situation. For example, neuroscientific studies testify that directly speech statements in a story actuate the auditory cortex (Yao et al., 2011), and that reading about happy events elicits greater activity in the muscles that control smiling (Havas et al., 2010). Reading a judgement that implies fictive motion (e.g., The road runs forth the declension) produces respective simulations of move through space in the brain (Matlock, 2004). Such simulation is idea to brand reading an enjoyable experience (Oatley, 1999; Mar and Oatley, 2008). Future studies should examine whether mental imagery or its vividness is a prerequisite for, or a upshot of, reading enjoyment, or whether these ii aspects are reciprocally related. It may further be interesting to examine the function of mental imagery across various schoolhouse topics (e.k., math, science), as well equally across media. Recent studies with adults show that loftier levels of vividness may raise the enjoyment of reading books but not of watching movies (e.g., Green et al., 2008; Weibel et al., 2011), but it is not nonetheless known whether this applies equally to early on adolescents.

Information technology could seem discouraging that students who merely made the transition to secondary school are not very likely to read exterior school. All the same, information technology is promising that enough of not-leisure readers in our study did admit that they bask reading in general. Fifty-nine percent of these students in the lower educational track and 69% in the college track claimed to enjoy reading. In this subgroup of non-leisure readers, therefore, it may not be fruitful to stimulate leisure reading through aiming to affect their "subjective joy of reading." This seems to be in line with models that link actual beliefs with motivation (for reviews meet, for example, Conner and Armitage, 1998; Eccles and Wigfield, 2002), also within the domain of reading (e.thousand., Guthrie et al., 2012; Schiefele et al., 2012). One explanation for our electric current finding could be that students' transition to secondary school has inverse the way they spend their leisure time and so that they stopped reading voluntarily. In futurity research, it would be interesting to explore whether children think that they read less or more than they did in primary schoolhouse and if then, whether they could explain why this is the example. Students' schoolhouse transition does not necessarily accept to change their enjoyment of reading books however, however. According to the negative spiral of reading behavior, it can exist speculated that this subgroup of non-leisure readers will lose their current reading enjoyment over the class of their secondary schoolhouse career; their lack of reading practice may result in less reading enjoyment and decreasing schoolhouse grades. As long every bit children admit to enjoying reading in general, information technology may be peculiarly important, therefore, that they acquire how to finer construction their time outside schoolhouse. Early on adolescents may peculiarly need assistance with creating enjoyable reading opportunities, equally they are known to be undergoing profound changes in neuropsychological and encephalon development (e.grand., Shaw et al., 2006; Giedd, 2008; Crone and Dahl, 2012). Research shows that parents are still of import role models, who can actively guide their early adolescents in their activities or who tin assistance them select materials that match their interests and reading level (Love and Hamston, 2004; Klauda, 2009).

The second aim of this study was to look into the role of sex, reading enjoyment, and mental imagery in the school achievement of not-leisure readers. In the higher runway, boys and girls who did not enjoy reading got significantly lower grades than their aforementioned-sex peers who did enjoy reading. This also was the case for girls in the lower track. For these boys and girls, it may exist interesting to examine whether their school achievement volition improve afterward enhancing their reading enjoyment. Experimental studies in classroom settings are yet express, but there is some evidence in lower form levels that programs including a motivational aspect better students' reading engagement (due east.one thousand., Souvignier and Mokhlesgerami, 2006; Guthrie et al., 2007; DeNaeghel et al., 2013). For example, instructional practices that focus on the relevance of a text, students' ain choice, reading success, collaborative structures, and thematic units seem to increment important motivational processes as intrinsic motivation, perceived autonomy, self-efficacy, social motivation, and mastery goals, respectively (Guthrie et al., 2007). Another arroyo would exist to teach mental imagery strategies, which may touch students' reading comprehension (Hibbing and Rankin-Erickson, 2003; Algozzine and Douville, 2004; for a review, see De Koning and Van der Schoot, 2013). In line with previous research (Green and Brock, 2002; Oatley, 2012), our study suggests that such an intervention may as well do good students' reading enjoyment. The positive spiral of reading behavior implies that improving the reading enjoyment in this subgroup of not-enjoyers could enhance their leisure reading behavior and, hence, their school achievement.

Our written report highlights that boys are in particular need of successful reading interventions. Almost nine out of ten boys in the lower educational track and viii out of 10 boys in the college educational track were categorized as non-leisure readers. Interestingly, the sex distribution of reading enjoyers in our sample was rather equal among not-leisure readers: virtually half of the not-leisure readers who enjoyed reading were boys, in both the lower (49%) and higher (56%) educational tracks. The book market place already seems to have developed ways to accost the fact that boys may demand more stimulation than girls to engage in reading activities. For instance, numerous websites can be constitute online that list books that are considered of specific interest for boys, by classifying them on a range of topics (e.g., animals, war, robots, outer infinite, sports) or genres (e.k., science fiction, fantasy, young adult) that boys are thought to exist attracted to. Some studies suggest that parents and teachers should be encouraged to develop a broader perspective on the range of (online) texts that they would count as "appropriate reading materials" in order for boys to outset reading (Telford, 1999; Love and Hamston, 2004). It should be examined, however, whether reading texts in newspapers, magazines, blogs, and/or on informative websites could equally affect students' reading enjoyment, mental imagery, and reading achievement as reading works of fiction (e.thou., Oatley, 1999; Mar et al., 2006). Students seem to particularly be engaged in their reading activity when they are captivated in the world of the volume. The positive spiral of reading suggests that such assimilation is needed to continue reading voluntarily.

Our study farther provides insight in the group that run the highest risk of poor school performance. Unexpectedly, the reading enjoyment of male non-leisure readers in the lower rails was not related to their schoolhouse achievement. Boys who claimed to bask reading got comparable grades every bit boys and girls who did not enjoy reading. It could exist that their reading abilities are then relatively poor that their general reading enjoyment cannot part every bit a protective gene for depression schoolhouse grades. The current reading abilities of these depression achievers may not be sufficient for agreement the age-appropriate reading materials that are supposed to exist fun for them to read voluntarily. Books that lucifer their reading level are often written for younger children (Schram, 2007). Either reading promotion initiative is likely to result in a farther avoidance of leisure reading, which will further increase their risk of dropping out of secondary or 3rd education. It may be necessary to first railroad train these students' (technical) reading skills. Put differently, we expect that students need a minimum level of reading abilities before their schoolhouse accomplishment will be affected past their general reading enjoyment. Future studies should reveal whether this indeed is the example.

We found no direct relation betwixt mental imagery and school achievement. This finding should be interpreted with circumspection, notwithstanding, due to the ceiling effect that seemed to affect our mental imagery measure out. To replicate and extend our findings, a questionnaire should be used that captures more variability and modalities in mental imagery behavior (see, for case, Blajenkova et al., 2006). Furthermore, our current indicator of reading enjoyment may have resulted in a dichotomous dissever that neglected the nuance of the grouping of students who practise not really hate books merely who likewise do not enjoy them as much equally their peers who really love reading. Future studies that embed reading enjoyment into the broader concepts of reading motivation, mental attitude, and interest may reveal a more comprehensive picture likewise (Conradi et al., 2014). In add-on, we looked at students' boilerplate school grades instead of their reading abilities. Stronger relations could be expected if we had measured students' actual reading performance. Considering reading abilities are an important indicator of general academic success (e.k., Alexander et al., 2007), information technology is plausible that students with college grades in our sample likewise are the meliorate readers. Due to the correlational nature of our study, nonetheless, we cannot be sure whether those who did non savour reading are the low-achieving students, or whether the low achievers particularly are depression reading enjoyers. Learning more about the evolution of low school achievement, low reading enjoyment and their interaction from an early historic period onward may particularly be useful when identifying the best approach for reaching students with reading stimulation programs. Interestingly, a peer civilisation of reading encouragement in schools seems to enhance the reading achievement of both boys and girls, regardless of their reading proficiency (Chiu and McBride-Chang, 2006).

In summary, our study indicates that nosotros accept to keep in listen that adolescents' behaviors may not reflect their motivation and emotional responses toward reading. That is, nosotros identified a grouping of seventh course students who savour reading even when reading is not among their preferred leisure activities. Accordingly, the nowadays information imply that reading enjoyment could brand a difference in students' school careers. Indeed, we showed that girls who were non-leisure readers and enjoyed reading in full general got college average school grades in both educational tracks. Boys who enjoyed reading in the higher educational rail also excelled compared to boys who did not enjoy reading. For their classmates who do non enjoy reading, it could be expected that their school achievement benefits from higher reading enjoyment levels. Boys in the lower track, yet, are not probable to profit from such an intervention. This report, therefore, underscores the importance of acknowledging individual differences in sex and reading enjoyment when aiming to improve the bookish careers of college versus lower achieving students.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or fiscal relationships that could exist construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The LEERLIJN study is conducted past the Center for Brain and Teaching, which is function of the LEARN! Research Institute of the VU University Amsterdam. The LEERLIJN study was fabricated possible past fiscal support from kingdom of the netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (FES-NWO grant/project number: 056-32-011). The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of participating pupils and their teachers. In addition, nosotros thank Wietske Idema, Karin Vander Heyden, Anneleen Post, and Marije Broens for their substantial contribution to the collection of data.

References

Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D., Lorch, Due east. P., and Milich, R. (2007). Comparing telly use and reading in children with ADHD and non-referred children beyond two age groups. Media Psychol. 9, 447–472. doi: ten.1080/15213260701291387

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., and Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summertime learning gap. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72, 167–180. doi: 10.1177/000312240707200202

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Algozzine, B., and Douville, P. (2004). Use mental imagery across the curriculum. Prev. Sch. Fail. 49, 36–39. doi: x.3200/PSFL.49.i.36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bennett, K. Thou., Weigel, D. J., and Martin, S. South. (2002). Children'south conquering of early literacy skills: examining family contributions. Early Kid. Res. Q. 17, 295–317. doi: x.1016/S0885-2006(02)00166-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., and Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaire. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 239–263. doi: 10.1002/acp.1182

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Busselle, R., and Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: a model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Commun. Theory 18, 255–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chiu, M. 1000., and McBride-Chang, C. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: a comparison of students in 43 countries. Sci. Stud. Read. 10, 331–362. doi: x.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Coles, M., and Hall, C. (2002). Gendered readings: learning from children'southward reading choices. J. Res. Read. 25, 96–108. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00161

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conlon, Eastward. 1000., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., and Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cerebral abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. J. Res. Read. 29, 11–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00290.10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conner, Thousand., and Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned beliefs: a review and avenues for farther research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28, 1429–1464. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01685.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Conradi, Thousand., Jang, B. Thousand., and McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: a conceptual review. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 26, 127–164. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9245-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, X., Jeter, C. B., Yang, D., Montague, P. R., and Eagleman, D. M. (2007). Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Res. 47, 474–478. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.013

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Koning, B. B., and Van der Schoot, G. (2013). Condign part of the story! refueling the interest in visualization strategies for reading comprehension. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 25, 261–287. doi: 10.1007/s10648-013-9222-vi

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

DeNaeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., and Aelterman, N. (2013). Enhancing Primary Students' Democratic Reading Motivation: Impact of an SDT-Based Teacher Training. Paper Presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Didactics (EARLI). Available at: http://hdl.handle.cyberspace/1854/LU-4247156

Dollinger, S. J., and Malmquist, D. (2009). Reliability and validity of single-item self-reports: with special relevance to college students' alcohol use, religiosity, study, and social life. J. Gen. Psychol. 136, 231–242. doi: 10.3200/GENP.136.3.231-242

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational behavior, values, and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferguson, P. D., and Fraser, B. J. (1998). Changes in learning environment during the transition from primary to secondary school. Larn. Environ. Res. 1, 369–383. doi: 10.1023/A:1009976529957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gardner, L. L., Cummings, R. B., Dunham, R. B., and Pierce, J. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: an empirical comparison. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 58, 898–915. doi: ten.1177/0013164498058006003

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Gennari, S. P. (2012). Representing movement in language comprehension: lessons from neuroimaging. Lang. Linguist. Compass six, 67–84. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.317

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Gille, E., Loijens, C., Noijons, J., and Zwitser, R. (2010). Resultaten PISA-2009 – Praktische Kennis en Vaardigheden Van fifteen-Jarigen; Nederlandse Uitkomsten Van Het Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) op Het Gebied Van Leesvaardigheid, Wiskunde, en Natuurwetenschappen in Het Jaar 2009. [Results PISA-2009 – Practical Knowledge and Skills of 15-Year-Olds; Dutch PISA-Results on Reading, Mathematics, and Science in 2009]. Bachelor at: http://world wide web.cito.nl/nl/onderzoek%20en%20wetenschap/onderzoek/deelname_onderzoek/pisa/resultaten.aspx

Dark-green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: the part of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Process. 38, 247–266. doi: x.1207/s15326950dp3802_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Green, M. C., and Brock, T. C. (2002). "In the listen's middle: transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion," in Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, eds M. C. Green, J. J. Foreign, and T. C. Brock. (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc), 315–341.

Google Scholar

Green, Grand. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., and Sabini, S. (2008). Transportation beyond media: repeated exposure to impress and film. Media Psychol. xi, 512–539. doi: 10.1080/15213260802492000

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., and Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educ. Psychol. 42, 237–250. doi: 10.1080/00461520701621087

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., and You, W. (2012). "Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading," in Handbook of Inquiry on Student Engagement, eds South. Fifty. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, and C. Wylie. (New York: Springer), 601–634. doi: 10.1007/978-one-4614-2018-7–29

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Havas, D. A., Glenberg, A. One thousand., Gutowski, 1000. A., Lucarelli, M. J., and Davidson, R. J. (2010). Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language. Psychol. Sci. 7, 895–900. doi: ten.1177/0956797610374742

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hibbing, A. North., and Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: using visual images to amend comprehension for centre school struggling readers. Read. Teach. 56, 758–770.

Google Scholar

Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, Due south., Osgood, Due west. D., Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children'due south self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Dev. 73, 509–527. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00421

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klauda, S. L. (2009). The part of parents in adolescents' reading motivation and action. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 21, 325–363. doi: ten.1007/s10648-009-9112-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Logan, Due south., and Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading power and attitudes: examining where these differences lie. J. Res. Read. 32, 199–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Love, M., and Hamston, J. (2004). Committed and reluctant male teenage readers: beyond bedtime stories. J. Lit. Res. 36, 335–400. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3603_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., and Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the brainchild and simulation of social experience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 173–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., and Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus nerds: exposure to fiction versus not-fiction, divergent associations with social power, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. J. Res. Pers. 40, 694–712. doi: ten.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morgan, P. L., and Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Except. Child. 73, 165–183. doi: x.1177/001440290707300203

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mullan, K. (2010). Families that read: a time-diary analysis of young people'southward and parents' reading. J. Res. Read. 33, 414–430. doi: x.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01438.ten

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (1999). Why fiction may be twice every bit true every bit fact: fiction equally cognitive and emotional simulation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 3, 101–117. doi: x.1037//1089-2680.3.two.101

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Learning to Learn: Student Engagement, Strategies and Practices, Vol. III. Pisa: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/19963777

Pedersen, S. (2005). Urban adolescents' out-of-school activity profiles: associations with youth, family, and school transition characteristics. Appl. Dev. Sci. 9, 107–124. doi: 10.1207/s1532480xads0902_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reed, H., Ouwehand, C., Van der Elst, W., Boschloo, A., and Jolles, J. (2010). "Measures of school performance for use in educational neuropsychology," in Frontiers in Neuroscience Conference Abstruse: EARLI SIG22 – Neuroscience and Instruction, Zürich. doi: ten.3389/conf.fnins.2010.11.00058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., and Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learn. Instr. 21, 550–559. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Gender differences in the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire: a meta-analysis. J. Ment. Imagery 19, 177–187.

Google Scholar

Sadoski, M., and Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assembly.

Google Scholar

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, East., Möller, J., and Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Read. Res. Q. 47, 427–463. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.030

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schram, D. H. (2007). Lezen in Het VMBO [Reading in the Pre-Vocational Track]. Amsterdam: Stichting Lezen.

Google Scholar

Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N.,et al. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical evolution in children and adolescents. Nature 440, 676–679. doi: 10.1038/nature04513

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Total Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Souvignier, E., and Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learn. Instr. 16, 57–71. doi: ten.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006

CrossRef Total Text | Google Scholar

Tellegen, S., and Frankhuisen, J. (2002). Waarom is Lezen Plezierig? [Why is Reading Enjoyable?]. Delft: Eburon.

The Dutch Inspectorate of Education. (2012). De Staat Van Vet Onderwijs; Onderwijsverslag 2010–2011 [The Status of Instruction; Educational Written report 2010–2011]. Utrecht: The Dutch Inspectorate of Education.

stodolayousitel.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01214/full

Share this post